ROCm
chipStar
| ROCm | chipStar | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4 | |
| 21 | 147 | |
| - | 4.8% | |
| 10.0 | 9.7 | |
| over 3 years ago | 8 days ago | |
| HTML | C++ | |
| - | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ROCm
- ROCm 6.1.0
-
AMD Funded a Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built on ROCm: It's Open-Source
ROCm is not spelled out anywhere in their documentation and the best answers in search come from Github and not AMD official documents
"Radeon Open Compute Platform"
https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/issues/1628
And they wonder why they are losing. Branding absolutely matters.
-
AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerators
https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/issues/1353
Bought in 2020. Stopped working in 2020. Not the latest, but in-production, advertised ROCm-capable, and what I could find during the Great GPU Shortage of 2020.
-
AMD leaps after launching AI chip that could challenge Nvidia dominance
Maybe so. But it isn't confidence inspiring when I go to see which cards are supported and I see this issue:
https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/issues/1714
With Nvidia cards, I know that if I buy any Nvidia card made in the last 10 years, CUDA code will run on it. Period. (Yes, different language levels require newer hardware, but Nvidia docs are quite clear about which CUDA versions require which silicon.)
The will-they-won't-they and the rapidly dropped support is hurting the otherwise excellent ROCm and HIP projects. There is a huge API surface to implement and it looks like they're making rapid gains.
-
GCN2, GCN3: What is the Technical, Non-Business Reason for Limited Supported in Linux (OpenSYCL/HIP/ROCM)? [Exasperated client]
Like, there is: https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm.github.io/blob/master/hardware.md but I'm pretty sure that's very very outdated, maybe from 4.x?
-
AMD’s Best GPU has some problems — Radeon RX 7900XTX VR Performance Review
Fair enough I'll give you that. Although it is listed as officially supported here, other documentation says it works but is not officially supported.
-
Finally, ROCm packages in [community]!
Do you have a source? The 580 and several older cards are listed as officially supported here, and even some 2xx/3xx cards are listed as unofficially supported.
-
[D] What’s the word on AMD gpus these days?
Some of the GPUs listed in your link are for consumers. For a more extensive list, see https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm.github.io/blob/master/hardware.md
-
Told an AI to generate Linux. Looks about right
Very conveniently, your linked page (the therein linked pages) do not talk about which GPUs actually do support ROCm. This is probably because AMDs newest cards do not support ROCm in any way, and would guess they don't want the sales pact this lack of feature could cause. Please do evaluate yourself, here: https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm.github.io/blob/master/hardware.md
chipStar
-
AMD Funded a Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built on ROCm: It's Open-Source
There is already a work-in-progress implementation of HIP on top of OpenCL https://github.com/CHIP-SPV/chipStar and the Mesa RustiCL folks are quite interested in getting that to run on top of Vulkan.
-
Vcc – The Vulkan Clang Compiler
chipStar (formerly CHIP-SPV) might also be worth checking out: https://github.com/CHIP-SPV/chipStar
It compiles CUDA/HIP C++ to SPIR-V that can run on top of OpenCL or Level Zero. (It does require OpenCL's compute flavored SPIR-V, instead of graphics flavored SPIR-V as seen in OpenGL or Vulkan. I also think it requires some OpenCL extensions that are currently exclusive to Intel NEO, but should on paper be coming to Mesa's rusticl implementation too.
- ChipStar: Run CUDA/Hip on SPIR-V via OpenCL/Level Zero
-
In the next 5 years, what do you think can push OpenCL adoption?
Regarding the second item (CUDA to OpenCL), have a look at hipstar: https://github.com/CHIP-SPV/hipstar
What are some alternatives?
rocm-arch - A collection of Arch Linux PKGBUILDS for the ROCm platform
FluidX3D - The fastest and most memory efficient lattice Boltzmann CFD software, running on all GPUs via OpenCL.
ROCR-Runtime - ROCm Platform Runtime: ROCr a HPC market enhanced HSA based runtime
OpenCL-Wrapper - OpenCL is the most powerful programming language ever created. Yet the OpenCL C++ bindings are cumbersome and the code overhead prevents many people from getting started. I created this lightweight OpenCL-Wrapper to greatly simplify OpenCL software development with C++ while keeping functionality and performance.
deep-daze - Simple command line tool for text to image generation using OpenAI's CLIP and Siren (Implicit neural representation network). Technique was originally created by https://twitter.com/advadnoun
Cgml - GPU-targeted vendor-agnostic AI library for Windows, and Mistral model implementation.
ROCm - AMD ROCm™ Software - GitHub Home [Moved to: https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm]
hipDNN - A thin wrapper around miOpen and cuDNN
stable-diffusion-webui - Stable Diffusion web UI
llvm - Intel staging area for llvm.org contribution. Home for Intel LLVM-based projects.
ZLUDA - CUDA on AMD GPUs
HIPIFY - HIPIFY: Convert CUDA to Portable C++ Code