basaran VS gpt4all

What are the current best "no reinventing the wheel" approaches to have Langchain use an LLM through a locally hosted REST API, the likes of Oobabooga or hyperonym/basaran with streaming support for 4-bit GPTQ?

Disclaimer: I am curating LLM-tools on github [1]

A few thoughts:

* allow for custom endpoint URLs, this way people can use open source LLMs with a fake openAI API backend like basaran[2] or llama-api-server[3]

* look into better embedding methods for info-retrieval like InstructorEmbeddings or Document Summary Index

* Don't use a single embedding per content item, use multiple to increase retrieval quality

1 https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...

2 https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

3 https://github.com/iaalm/llama-api-server

open-source alternative to the OpenAI text completion API (https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran)

Guanaco-65B[0] using Basaran[1] for your OpenAI compatible API. You can use any ChatGPT front-end which lets you change the OpenAI endpoint URL.

[0] An fp4 finetune of LLaMA-30B by Tim Dettmers

[1] https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

For lm-eval, I think you'd either need to take GPTQ's inference script and shim it into a model: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/master/lm_eval/models or you might be able to use a project like https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran and then you could use the gpt3 model...

There are also: - Basaran repo: "Basaran is an open-source alternative to the OpenAI text completion API. It provides a compatible streaming API for your Hugging Face Transformers-based text generation models". "...Compatibility with OpenAI API and client libraries..."; - llama-cpp-python repo: "Simple Python bindings for @ggerganov's llama.cpp library...". "...OpenAI-like API...".

I want to start with a totally freely available model, so again, that excludes things like LLaMA where the weights are only available through a wait list. The two models that most get my attention and (I think, and hope) fit my criteria of open availability are Cerebras-GPT (13b) and Bloomz (7b). The tools to process and fine-tune that seem most feasible to me, from my limit knowledge, are xturing and basaran.

I don’t know if Ollama can do this but https://gpt4all.io/ can.

Gpt4all is a local desktop app with a Python API that can be trained on your documents: https://gpt4all.io/

The readme page is cryptic. What does 'mature' mean in this context? What is the sample text a continuation of?

Hving a gif the thing in use would be great, similar to the gpt4all readme page. (https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all)

Check https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all instead.

"I ran performance tests on two systems, here's the results of system 1, and heres the results of system 2. Summarize the results, and build a markdown table containing x,y,z rows."

"extract the reusable functions out of this bash script"

"write me a cfssl command to generate a intermediate CA"

"What is the regex for _____"

"Here are my accomplishments over the last 6 months, summarize them into a 1 page performance report."

etc etc etc

If you're not using GPT4 or some LLM as part of your daily flow you're working too hard.

Get GPT4All (https://gpt4all.io), log into OpenAI, drop $20 on your account, get a API key, and start using GPT4.

offline versija, nors ir ne tokia pažengus - https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all ; https://gpt4all.io/index.html

Take a look at https://gpt4all.io, their docs are pretty awesome

I run one. I built an iMessage-like frontend to it using plain JS and a Python websocket backend. I mostly just use it for curiosity and playing with different prompts. I only have 16GB of RAM to dedicate to it, so I use an 8B parameter model which is enough for fun and chitchat, but I don't find it good enough to replace ChatGPT.

https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all