docker-tautulli VS wstg

Offcourse I am not building the image for firefox, I will be just using the kasm firefox image from linuxserver.io instead.

Or if you mean there are other people other than you who can connect to the tunnel, then you could use HTTP basic authentication on NPM, or Authelia, or even Authentik. Not sure how easy it is to set them up with NPM, but with linuxserver.io's `swag` image, HTTP basic and Authelia are easy to set up while Authentik is a little more complicated but still doable.

Next you want to chose which docker image you want to follow. guide this is the one I have followed for all of the arr apps

I'm still fairly new to Docker but have managed to get several containers up and running (Plex, Sabnzbd, *arr apps etc). I'm trying to set up Calibre using the docker-compose provided by linuxserver.io:

Calibre 7.1.0, Calibre Web 0.6.21. Both Stable linuxserver.io dockers on UNRaid.

I'm on unraid using the linuxserver.io grocy app from community apps.

I am running Calibre in a Docker container and I wanted to see if there is a way to have all media automatically converted to a specified format. I am using linuxserver.io container parameters and they have a variable that seems to require x64 to handle conversion but I do not see where to put the variable. Any assistance here would be much appreciated.

We are migrating hudu2 setup to kubernetes. We switched to linuxserver.io nginix container from default swag container since we are using ingress controller to manage the certificates.

I'm running my Wifi controller in docker and have just seen there are some features I'd like to play around with in the release candidate so I updated my online account to enable this download but the container just wants me to download a firmware file, ideally, I would like to update the container but it seems linuxserver.io don't have this version so I wonder if anyone else here has a way of doing this?

I'm using the linuxserver.io Nextcloud image, and I've also set the PGID and PUID to my current user (As an env.).

At the beginning, I read all things in here https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/, also gets familiars with owasp top 10. But later on, I focus on a few techniques only.

I highly recommend PortSwigger's Web Security Academy and have a look at the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide.

You can follow OWASP web testing guide to learn about the test cases performed during testing.

Most web app testing is performed using this guide https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/

I highly recommend the OWASP Testing Guide: https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/

Hi, sit and learn https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/ that's the best way, than may be EJPT.

A short-lived branch-per-issue helps ensure that its resulting pull request doesn’t get too large, making it unwieldy and hard to review carefully. The definition of “short” varies depending on the team or project’s development velocity: for a small team producing a commercial app (like a startup), the time from issue branch creation to PR probably won’t exceed a week. For open source projects like the OWASP WSTG that depends on volunteers working around busy schedules, branches may live for a few weeks to a few months, depending on the contributor. Generally, strive to iterate in as little time as possible.