eslint-plugin-react VS Next.js

JavaScript Standard Style is less opinionated about JSX formatting and largely leaves JSX as-is. In a React project, you should integrate with React-specific linting rules for ESLint. The generally accepted configurations are eslint-plugin-react and eslint-plugin-react-hooks, enforcing some best practices of writing React code.

> [1] https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/blob/maste...

From what I remember, being able to pass children as a prop is considered a side-effect of an implementation detail, that breaks the expected abstraction. There really isn't any reason to use it, and I think there's a chance it may even confuse the virtual dom diffing?

Also this would prevent you from accidentally doing both at once:

  Is it me?}>

I try to focus on the issues rather than individuals, but the root of the problems in the listed eslint plugin libraries points to ljharb.

If you do some simple digging into these libraries, you will find that these types of commits are quite common within them.

https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/commit/e1d...

https://github.com/jsx-eslint/jsx-ast-utils/commit/bad51d062...

https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y/commit/...

He would rather see the download count of these polyfill libraries https://github.com/ljharb/ljharb#projects-i-maintain increase, compared to assessing the health of the JavaScript ecosystem.

An obvious pick for React projects, but eslint-plugin-react along with their plugin:react/recommended rule set is a must. This will give you some sensible rules such as requiring a key to be specified in JSX arrays. eslint-config-airbnb is another good (if a bit loose) base rule set on top of eslint-plugin-react to start from.

If you already have the eslint-plugin-react installed, you can enable the following rule.

You can also add ESLint now (props to @femincan for the suggestion). It comes with recommended settings for these plugins: typescript, prettier, react, react-hooks, jsx-a11y.

Also for what it’s worth, there’s a React ESLint code rule that can enforce this behavior either way for Component props - I’m not in front of a code base atm, but I wonder if my preference for the syntax above is influenced by a popular linting preset like AirBnB which enforces this rule? https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/blob/master/docs/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.md

The missing piece is on this page, in a small note at the end of the page: the eslint rule to disallow missing React when using JSX.

Thanks for weighing in, that's good to know. After wondering if this could be auto-refactored, I came across https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/blob/maste..., will definitely have to give that (with `--fix`) a try in the new year and see if I can get the team on board! – desire for typescript being a compelling factor.

Personally I do like the non-destructured `props.abc` throughout component code, really helps clarify at a glance where something is coming from, whether it's locally or externally defined, etc. Code style is an endless exercise in compromises/opinions though, even _with_ tools like eslint and prettier.

Next.js is a powerful React framework that enables developers to build server-rendered applications, static websites, and more. It's designed for production and provides features like automatic code splitting and optimized prefetching.

// source: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/src/lib/worker.ts#L121C15-L129C16 for (;;) { onActivity() const result = await Promise.race(\[ (this.\_worker as any)\[method\](...args), restartPromise, \]) if (result !== RESTARTED) return result if (onRestart) onRestart(method, args, ++attempts) }

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/27666 One of them said 'renaming folder to uppercase' might cause trouble. git might not recognize case-sensetive changes by default.

Next.js has long cemented itself as one of the front runners in the web framework world for JavaScript/TypeScript projects so we’re going to be using that. More specifically we’re going to be using V14 of Next.js which allows us to use some exciting new features like Server Actions and the App Router.

Web frameworks like Next.js will usually include this feature, but do check that they set the caching headers correctly!

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.

Would you like to elaborate on that?

In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.

For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/

Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/

Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main

Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/

React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.

Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.

Next.js: For the website and the admin dashboard

Until the time of writing, there is no official example of how to enable runtime environmental variables in a Dockerized Next.js app, as utilizing unstable_noStore would only dynamically evaluate variables on the server (node.js runtime). There is also an interesting discussion regarding this topic on GitHub.

next.js is a very popular React framework. remix-adonisjs includes more functionality through the AdonisJS backend ecosystem, and should be easier to self-host and self-manage.