excon VS Spyke

Compare excon vs Spyke and see what are their differences.

excon

Usable, fast, simple HTTP 1.1 for Ruby (by excon)

Spyke

Interact with REST services in an ActiveRecord-like manner (by balvig)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
excon Spyke
1 -
1,154 898
0.2% -
8.0 5.5
29 days ago 17 days ago
Ruby Ruby
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

excon

Posts with mentions or reviews of excon. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-05-07.
  • Use Rails
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 May 2024
    A internal network boundary is probably worth it for heavy jobs, since you usually don't want it to interfere with serving web requests (no matter the tech).

    You probably already know what I would say to each of those examples.

    > Rails timing out after 30s while allocating 500MB of memory (mostly) in ActiveRecord to compute 5MB of JSON to return to an API caller.

    I can make a JS or Go program perform the same way. In fact the exact same thing happened in my shop with Go/Gorm. The key question is: how do you compute the 5mb of JSON? The devil is in those details. We changed the way we computed ours, and the issue was gone.

    > 90% of request latency of ~10s spent waiting for downstream services to respond to requests. Most of these could be fired off concurrently (ie `Promise.all` in node). 9s/10s this Rails worker is sitting around doing nothing and eating up ~300MB of memory.

    This sounds broken. Why is the worker doing nothing for 9 out of 10s? But like I said earlier, there are a bunch of ways to use HTTP1.1 pipelining to run them concurrently. (https://github.com/excon/excon and https://github.com/HoneyryderChuck/httpx support it, but you can also do that with Net::HTTP I believe) And you can still start threads, which are still concurrent while blocking on IO.

    > trying to extract out Authorization to a centralized service (so that other extracted services don't have to call into the monolith in order to make authorization decisions) is a major pain as the monolith now has to make calls out to the centralized auth system to in order to make authz decisions.

    This seems unrelated to Rails. Not sure why monolith can't continue handling authorization.

Spyke

Posts with mentions or reviews of Spyke. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning Spyke yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing excon and Spyke you can also consider the following projects:

Faraday - Simple, but flexible HTTP client library, with support for multiple backends.

Http Client - 'httpclient' gives something like the functionality of libwww-perl (LWP) in Ruby.

httparty - :tada: Makes http fun again!

Sawyer - Secret User Agent of HTTP

Typhoeus - Typhoeus wraps libcurl in order to make fast and reliable requests.

RESTClient - Simple HTTP and REST client for Ruby, inspired by microframework syntax for specifying actions.

HTTP - HTTP (The Gem! a.k.a. http.rb) - a fast Ruby HTTP client with a chainable API, streaming support, and timeouts