fresh
vite
fresh | vite | |
---|---|---|
124 | 801 | |
11,947 | 65,358 | |
0.8% | 0.9% | |
9.6 | 9.8 | |
7 days ago | 3 days ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fresh
-
What's Your Favorite Tech Stack and Why?
Deno: Deno with one of it's frameworks (like Fresh
-
🧠 50 Articles to Level Up
The road to Fresh 2.0 (https://github.com/denoland/fresh/issues/2363) by Marvin Hagemeister Can't wait for seeing the end of the road! All in all great changes ahead.
- The Road to Fresh 2.0
-
Fly.it Has GPUs Now
Because I have secret magical powers that you probably don't, it's basically free for me. Here's the breakdown though:
The application server uses Deno and Fresh (https://fresh.deno.dev) and requires a shared-1x CPU at 512 MB of ram. That's $3.19 per month as-is. It also uses 2GB of disk volume, which would cost $0.30 per month.
As far as post generation goes: when I first set it up it used GPT-3.5 Turbo to generate prose. That cost me rounding error per month (maybe like $0.05?). At some point I upgraded it to GPT-4 Turbo for free-because-I-got-OpenAI-credits-on-the-drama-day reasons. The prose level increase wasn't significant.
With the GPU it has now, a cold load of the model and prose generation run takes about 1.5 minutes. If I didn't have reasons to keep that machine pinned to a GPU (involving other ridiculous ventures), it would probably cost about 5 minutes per day (increased the time to make the math easier) of GPU time with a 40 GB volume (I now use Nous Hermes Mixtral at Q5_K_M precision, so about 32 GB of weights), so something like $6 per month for the volume and 2.5 hours of GPU time, or about $6.25 per month on an L40s.
In total it's probably something like $15.75 per month. That's a fair bit on paper, but I have certain arrangements that make it significantly less cheap for me. I could re-architect Arsène to not have to be online 24/7, but it's frankly not worth it when the big cost is the GPU time and weights volume. I don't know of a way to make that better without sacrificing model quality more than I have to.
For a shitpost though, I think it'd totally worth it to pay that much. It's kinda hilarious and I feel like it makes for a decent display of how bad things could get if we go full "AI replaces writers" like some people seem to want for some reason I can't even begin to understand.
I still think it's funny that I have to explicitly tell people to not take financial advice from it, because if I didn't then they will.
-
Deno in 2023
Deno has also created a Next.js competitor, Fresh. I found it a few weeks ago and am starting to go through the docs, looks like a good overall concept. https://fresh.deno.dev/
- React is actively harmful if your website is static
-
We need an official backend web framework
https://fresh.deno.dev/ - Fresh embraces the tried and true design of server side rendering and progressive enhancement on the client side.
-
Hacktoberfest 2023 Recap
Along the way, I not only got the oppurtunity to revise old concepts that had blurred in my memory, but also learnt about new technologies like Fresh.js, a framework from Deno (a js runtime engine) that uses Preact, a React Routing library and used Chakra UI for the first time.
-
Why Can't I Just Use This Function? The Struggles with Code Reusability in JS
A whole project might be released as a server or framework. Frameworks like fresh, and astro) both have had things deep within them that I've wanted to reuse, within fresh it's the esbuild configuration, and islands functionality, and within astro it's the rendering of astro files themselves.
-
JavaScript First, Then TypeScript
The Fresh framework by Deno cited an improved developer experience due to tighter feedback loops.
vite
-
Comparing Hattip vs. Express.js for modern app development
As of this writing, initializing a Hattip project requires some manual commands. However, keep in mind that a zero-config development environment based on Vite is in the works.
-
React TypeScript - Vite + React
import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 4200, } })
-
I Disappear
For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.
-
FlowDiver: The Road to SSR - Part 1
Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.
-
Inflight Magazine no. 9
We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.
-
Top 12+ Battle-Tested React Boilerplates for 2024
Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.
-
Vite vs Nextjs: Which one is right for you?
Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.
-
Setup React Typescript with Vite & ESLint
import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })
-
Approaches to Styling React Components, Best Use Cases
I am currently utilizing Vite:
-
Getting started with TiniJS framework
Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/
What are some alternatives?
astro - The web framework for content-driven websites. ⭐️ Star to support our work!
Next.js - The React Framework
remix - Build Better Websites. Create modern, resilient user experiences with web fundamentals.
parcel - The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀
qwik - Instant-loading web apps, without effort
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler