gunicorn
django-guardian
gunicorn | django-guardian | |
---|---|---|
18 | 7 | |
9,587 | 3,565 | |
- | 0.7% | |
8.0 | 0.0 | |
11 days ago | 2 months ago | |
Python | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gunicorn
-
Nginx Unit – Universal web app server
I'm hoping so – gunicorn has a long-open pull request that would fix `--reuse-port`, which currently does nothing
https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/pull/2938
- SynchronousOnlyOperation from celery task using gevent execution pool on django orm
-
Deploying Django when using python-socketio
However, I'm curious about the best way to deploy, specifically with regard to WSGI. I've tried using the raw eventlet WSGI server (`eventlet.wsgi.server(eventlet.listen(("", 8000)), application)`). I then start it with `python manage.py runserver`. This has worked okay, but I'm unsure about how scalable it is. It seems like the standard stack is Django + Gunicorn + NGINX. Based on `python-socketio` documentation, this should be possible. I tried django + eventlet + gunicorn, but it seems like gunicorn a) [doesn't play nice with eventlet](https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/pull/2581) and b) only supports one worker. Gevent + Gunicorn doesn't have this bug, but still only supports one worker. Also, I'm not sure how actively maintained gevent is. So I'm not sure how scalable either Gunicorn + eventlet or Gunicorn + geventlet is as a WSGI server. So I'm not sure if Gunicorn is my best bet, or if it's too limited.
- The Django ecosystem is not so good
-
3 cool project ideas for Python programmers
For building your API, I recommend using the Flask library. It is very beginner-friendly, and you will be able to build a simple API in a matter of minutes! Keep in mind that, for a more serious project, you should definitely use something like gunicorn to run you API as a production server.
-
Django 4.1 Released
Interesting looks like it might actually be a python bug. Somehow just changing from sys.exit(0) -> os._exit(0) apparently fixes it.
https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/pull/2820
-
Serverless Templates for AWS and Python
The cool thing is that you can easily migrate your WSGI- application such as Flask, Django, or Gunicorn to AWS.
-
Scope of database threads + connections + sessions
Yeah, that's kind of the impression I was getting. I stumbled across a github issue for gunicorn along these lines.
-
Running Django with Gunicorn - Best Practice
Taking a glimpse at gunicorn's code it looks like they pretty much all do the same: 2. seems to be creating a wsgi app using django's internals, and 3. uses 2.
django-guardian
-
Three Ways to Secure Database APIs: Which Is Right for You?
You can mitigate the pain by using libraries like accesscontrol, express-rbac, django-guardian, etc., to manage authorization more declaratively. But making sure nothing leaks is still a significant challenge.
-
Migrating From Django to Next.js: What’s the Equivalent for Django-Guardian?
These pieces fit together very well and are sufficient for replacing most of the goodies Django provides. However, there's one piece missing. Django has a built-in permissions feature, but it's limited to model-level control, i.e., if a user or group has X access to model type Y. Many users have been using the popular django-guardian package to implement row-level permissions. It allows you to establish permissions between users/groups and objects, manages the underlying permission database tables, and provides APIs for configuring and checking such permissions.
-
The Django ecosystem is not so good
https://github.com/django-guardian/django-guardian/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ABug
-
how to check user permission in a community
Could use django-guardian for this instead: https://github.com/django-guardian/django-guardian
-
How to handle per object permission in Django nowadays?
I was about to use django-guardian until I came across the following in the official documentation:
-
what are 3 django packages everyone should know about?
django-guardian for per object permissions
- Creating Users of different Departments in Django
What are some alternatives?
waitress - Waitress - A WSGI server for Python 3
django-rules - Awesome Django authorization, without the database
Werkzeug - The comprehensive WSGI web application library.
oso - Oso is a batteries-included framework for building authorization in your application.
bjoern - A screamingly fast Python 2/3 WSGI server written in C.
Carteblanche - Module to align code with thoughts of users and designers. Also magically handles navigation and permissions.
uwsgi - Official uWSGI docs, examples, tutorials, tips and tricks
django-fsm - Django friendly finite state machine support
meinheld - Meinheld is a high performance asynchronous WSGI Web Server (based on picoev)
django-bootstrap-modal-forms - A Django plugin for creating AJAX driven forms in Bootstrap modal.
hypercorn - Hypercorn is an ASGI and WSGI Server based on Hyper libraries and inspired by Gunicorn.
django-defender - A simple super fast django reusable app that blocks people from brute forcing login attempts