manifold
Fable: F# |> BABEL
manifold | Fable: F# |> BABEL | |
---|---|---|
79 | 60 | |
2,238 | 2,829 | |
2.5% | 0.9% | |
9.3 | 9.7 | |
5 days ago | 22 days ago | |
Java | F# | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
manifold
- Show HN: Ditch your ORM with type-safe native SQL
- Show HN: Traits for Java via True Delegation
- Show HN: Automatic Type-Safe CSV
- Show HN: Htmx with ManTL Templates
- Type-safely embed SQL directly into Java
-
Universal Domain Types
Considering the Amount domain types, I like the manifold project’s unit expression[1] approach where the unit and domain type are integrated and always reconciled.
1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/tree/master/man...
-
Javalin – a simple web framework for Java and Kotlin
> I am glad to see a project that provides a robust and elegant API for building rest services in Java.
Alternatives for _consuming_ REST services is perhaps an equally interesting proposition, particularly since there are potentially potentially many consumers per service e.g., the manifold JSON project[1].
Other areas where Springboot feels overbearing include JPA/ORM support. In my view this is its greatest weakness, but like the "no one ever got fired for buying IBM" cliche, the same can be said today about Springboot.
1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/blob/master/man...
- Show HN: I made Java look better than it deserves
- True Delegation vs. Forwarding
Fable: F# |> BABEL
-
Dada, an Experiement by the Creators of Rust
This conversation could be referring to https://fable.io/
Other than that, the question is indeed strange and I agree with your statements.
-
Exploring a foreign F# codebase
NOTE: For larger codebases with more history it is likely that the Program.fs file will have a lot of orchestration and logic as well. given that it is often where everything clashes and starts, for example the Fable Entrypoint is in Entry.fs and it contains a lot of code. The best you can do always is to start at the bottom of the file and work your way up. Remember: Everything at the bottom uses what has already been defined at the top so there are no circular dependencies or random functions/types at the bottom that can trip you off, everything comes from the top!
-
Revisiting WASM for F#
I am a big fan of going with web components + plain (build-less) javascript whenever possible, so it is not surprising that I often favor things like the Fable Compiler, where I can target my F# code directly to javascript and be as close to the native JS experience as possible, both for interop concerns and for ecosystem integration.
-
A new F# compiler feature: graph-based type-checking
Fable compiler - https://fable.io/
The F# community is very friendly (these sub-communities as well), and they have plenty of good issues/opportunities to contribute OSS work to across any skill level.
Phosphor isn't hiring right now, but we expect to begin a search for FE/interface engineers over the next few month. Email [email protected] for anyone interested.
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
- Fable: an F# to Dart compiler
-
Dart 3.1 and a retrospective on functional style programming in Dart
Stuff like this: https://github.com/fable-compiler/Fable/issues/1822
It just seems like an incredibly ambitious project that appears to have very little equal but is mainly worked on by a handful of people but no corporate backing. I get the feeling that if you want to use it, you'll either be the only one doing what you're doing or among just a few people. I already use F# and feel this way about the core language itself.
-
Elixir – Why the dot (when calling anonymous functions)?
F# is also part of the OCaml family, has a great to-JS transpiler (https://fable.io/) and F# code can also be used in .NET projects.
- Is it possible to write games like Pac-Man in a functional language?
-
URGENT HELP NEEDED! Should I learn C#, ASP.NET and the new MAUI framework?
I have heard many good things about https://fable.io/ Fable converts F# code to JavaScript. There are currently 407 packages available for interacting with existing JavaScript packages and frameworks.
What are some alternatives?
Lombok - Very spicy additions to the Java programming language.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
graphql-java - GraphQL Java implementation
Sutil - Lightweight front-end framework for F# / Fable. No dependencies.
Kotlin-Compiler-Crash-Course - A repository of helpful sources to figure out what the Kotlin compiler really is
ClojureCLR - A port of Clojure to the CLR, part of the Clojure project
java-oo - Java Operator Overloading
Roslyn - The Roslyn .NET compiler provides C# and Visual Basic languages with rich code analysis APIs.
create-rust-app - Set up a modern rust+react web app by running one command.
Feliz - A fresh retake of the React API in Fable and a collection of high-quality components to build React applications in F#, optimized for happiness
factor - Factor programming language
haxe - Haxe - The Cross-Platform Toolkit