rqlite
mvsqlite
| rqlite | mvsqlite | |
|---|---|---|
| 112 | 26 | |
| 15,038 | 1,332 | |
| 1.2% | - | |
| 9.9 | 0.0 | |
| 5 days ago | 16 days ago | |
| Go | Rust | |
| MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rqlite
- The lightweight, easy-to-use, distributed relational database built on SQLite
-
CursusDB – A new scalable distributed document oriented database
Seems like you could do the same with rqlite [1], since SQLite supports JSON.
[1]: https://rqlite.io
-
Rqlite 8.0
rqlite[1] creator here, happy to answer any questions about rqlite, this latest release, and how it works.
[1] https://rqlite.io
-
Adding new database engine support
I found simple distributed RQlite https://github.com/rqlite/rqlite based on raft and sqlite. How hard is to add it?
- I'm All-In on Server-Side SQLite
-
So, you want to deploy on the edge?
rqlite[1] creator here, happy to answer any questions. rqlite also supports read-only nodes, which can also help with reads at the "edge". It probably wouldn't scale to 100s of nodes, it is an option.
"rqlite supports adding read-only nodes. You can use this feature to add read scalability to the cluster if you need a high volume of reads, or want to distribute copies of the data nearer to clients – but don’t want those nodes counted towards the quorum. These types of nodes are also known as non-voting nodes."
[1] https://rqlite.io/
[2] https://rqlite.io/docs/clustering/read-only-nodes/
- LiteFS Cloud: Distributed SQLite with Managed Backups
- Show HN: Rqlite, distributed DB built on SQLite, now runs on MIPS, RISC, PowerPC
- rqlite v7.19.0: the lightweight distributed relational database built on Go, Raft, and SQLite -- now runs on MIPS, PowerPC, and RISC
- rqlite v7.18: the lightweight distributed database built on Go, Raft, and SQLite -- now with new Unified HTTP endpoint for easy reads and writes
mvsqlite
-
FoundationDB: A Distributed Key-Value Store
I’ve been using FDB for toy projects for a while. It’s truly rock solid. That being said, I wish there were more layers.
Ideally someone could implement the firestore or dynamodb api on top.
https://github.com/losfair/mvsqlite
-
Go bindings to SQLite using Wazero
For the rough plan, it's Cloud Backed SQLite meets FoundationDB.
-
SQLite-based databases on the Postgres protocol? Yes we can
- Oh, and if you're wondering about backup to S3, they have that too: https://github.com/libsql/bottomless
- Uh, sqld can integrated with this https://github.com/losfair/mvsqlite, so now your SQLite is backed by FoundationDB!?
- Meanwhile Litestream exists https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/
- We Built Fly Postgres
-
Litestream doesn't do SQLite replication anymore (LiteFS does)
Shameless plug of my [mvSQLite](https://github.com/losfair/mvsqlite) project here! It's basically another distributed SQLite, but with support for everything expected from a proper distributed database: synchronous replication, strictly serializable transactions, + scalable reads and writes w/ multiple concurrent writers.
-
SQLite: QEMU All over Again?
This project looks really exciting!
I'm working on mvsqlite [1], a distributed SQLite based on FoundationDB. When doing the VFS integration I have always wanted to patch SQLite itself, but didn't because of uncertainty around correctness of the patched version...
A few features on my wishlist:
1. Asynchronous I/O. mvsqlite is currently doing its own prefetch prediction that is not very accurate. I assume higher layers in SQLite have more information that can help with better prediction.
2. Custom page allocator. SQLite internally uses a linked list to manage database pages - this causes contention on any two transactions that both allocate or free pages.
3. Random ROWID, without the `max(int64)` row trick. Sequentially increasing ROWIDs is a primary source of contention, and causes significant INSERT slowdown in my benchmark [2].
[1] https://github.com/losfair/mvsqlite
[2] https://univalence.me/posts/mvsqlite-bench-20220930
- Show HN: mvSQLite v0.2
- mvsqlite: Distributed SQLite built on FoundationDB
-
Show HN: Query SQLite files stored in S3
That DynamoDB VFS looks cool! I agree that the VFS api makes one think about plenty of crazy ideas. Someone is working on a VFS based on Foundation DB[0] that looks very promising. It was recently discussed here[1]
[0]: https://github.com/losfair/mvsqlite
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32269287
- GitHub - losfair/mvsqlite: Distributed, MVCC SQLite that runs on FoundationDB.
What are some alternatives?
dqlite - Embeddable, replicated and fault-tolerant SQL engine.
litestream - Streaming replication for SQLite.
awesome-sqlite - A curated list of awesome things related to SQLite
cockroach - CockroachDB - the open source, cloud-native distributed SQL database.
litefs - FUSE-based file system for replicating SQLite databases across a cluster of machines
bolt
datasette-stripe - A web SQL interface to your Stripe account using Datasette.
etcd - Distributed reliable key-value store for the most critical data of a distributed system [Moved to: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd]
blueboat - All-in-one, multi-tenant serverless JavaScript runtime.
TinyGo - Go compiler for small places. Microcontrollers, WebAssembly (WASM/WASI), and command-line tools. Based on LLVM.