SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Jextract Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to jextract
-
gestalt
A Java configuration library that allows you to build your configurations from multiple sources, merges them and convert them into an easy-to-use typesafe configuration class. A simple but powerful interface allows you to navigate to a path within your configurations and retrieve a configuration object, list, or a primitive value. (by gestalt-config)
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
jackson-modules-base
Uber-project for foundational modules of Jackson that build directly on core components but nothing else; not including data format or datatype modules
jextract reviews and mentions
- Jextract Guide
- JExtract Guide (to generate Code to access the native library in Java)
- JEP draft: Integrity and Strong Encapsulation
-
JEP 442: Foreign Function & Memory API (Third Preview)
ok, maybe I mixed it up with jextract https://github.com/openjdk/jextract
-
Java 20: A Sneak Peek on the Panama FFM API
This is one level below P/Invoke. It just offers a linking runtime API.
There's also has a tool that can generate all the bindings from a C header file automatically: https://github.com/openjdk/jextract
Then it doesn't really matter whether annotations are used or not, or some more low-level linker API (like FFM went with). As a user you just call into the generated bindings.
That's the philosophy: the JDK provides the low-level capabilities, and jextract provides the 'civilization', i.e. a usability focused layer on top. One of the advantages is that the JDK doesn't compete with other existing solutions, and those existing solution can benefit from the new linking runtime APIs as well.
-
Why Kotlin/Native C Interop not supporting C Preprocessors such as Macros ?
Depending on how work-aroundy you're feeling, using Kotlin/JVM with Panama and jextract might be the way to go. The generated bindings are a bit ugly, you'd need to use the very latest JVM and enable the preview features, and it won't help if you need to target iOS. But the jextract tool can fully understand C headers including macros because it's using the LLVM clang API to do so.
-
JNA vs JNI Performance Question
You can use jextract and a JDK 19 pre-release build to generate bindings and then do a JMH benchmark.
-
Using Linux's memfd_secret syscall from the JVM with JEP-419 - Panama
None of that needs to be done in the JDK, though, and the "big" project that can make a big difference here is jextract. The rest can easily be done by libraries.
-
Possible to use Kotlin/Native to call Win API from Kotlin/JVM?
Panama incubator module is available on jdk 17 and you can also use jextract (https://github.com/openjdk/jextract) to generate all java code without writing any JNI glue code.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 7 May 2024
Stats
openjdk/jextract is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 only which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of jextract is Java.
Popular Comparisons
Sponsored