SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Std-simd Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to std-simd
-
CppCoreGuidelines
The C++ Core Guidelines are a set of tried-and-true guidelines, rules, and best practices about coding in C++
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
DirectXMath
DirectXMath is an all inline SIMD C++ linear algebra library for use in games and graphics apps
-
C++ REST SDK
The C++ REST SDK is a Microsoft project for cloud-based client-server communication in native code using a modern asynchronous C++ API design. This project aims to help C++ developers connect to and interact with services.
-
xsimd
C++ wrappers for SIMD intrinsics and parallelized, optimized mathematical functions (SSE, AVX, AVX512, NEON, SVE))
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
std-simd reviews and mentions
-
A proposal for the next version of C [pdf]
neither proposing nor taking a position on this possible addition)
> ... For completeness we would also like to add that a serious issue is that C still lacks vector operations.
Those are good points. The authors don't take a stance on it, but I do think that syntax for packed structs should be standardized. IMO, so should syntax for inline assembly (both as optional features). These are already common extensions; this is exactly what they should standardize. The additions of "typeof" and #embed are also good examples of this (they had been talking about adding #embed since 1995 [1]).
As for vector instructions, I'm unsure how it could be implemented in a standard way, but I'm not against it. Maybe something like this [2], but with the syntax changed for C instead of C++.
[1]: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.std.c/c/zWFEXDvyTwM
[2]: https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd
-
SIMD Everywhere Optimization from ARM Neon to RISC-V Vector Extensions
Interesting, thanks for sharing :)
At the time we open-sourced Highway, the standardization process had already started and there were some discussions.
I'm curious why stdlib is the only path you see to default? Compare the activity level of https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd vs https://github.com/google/highway. As to open-source usage, after years of std::experimental, I see <200 search hits [1], vs >400 for Highway [2], even after excluding several library users.
But that aside, I'm not convinced standardization is the best path for a SIMD library. We and external users extend Highway on a weekly basis as new use cases arise. What if we deferred those changes to 3-monthly meetings, or had to wait for one meeting per WD, CD, (FCD), DIS, (FDIS) stage before it's standardized? Standardization seems more useful for rarely-changing things.
1: https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+std::experim...
2: https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+HWY_NAMESPAC...
-
SIMD intrinsics and the possibility of a standard library solution
std-simd - 451 GH stars
-
Optimizing compilers reload vector constants needlessly
Bad news. For SIMD there are not cross-platform intrinsics. Intel intrinsics map directly to SSE/AVX instructions and ARM intrinsics map directly to NEON instructions.
For cross-platform, your best bet is probably https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd
There's https://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page But, it's tremendously complicated for anything other than large-scale linear algebra.
And, there's https://github.com/microsoft/DirectXMath But, it has obvious biases :P
-
SPO 600 project part 3 - Analysis
But after I worked with auto-vectorization(I wrote about that in part 2), I decided to switch and try myself by adding intrinsics if I was able. You can track my progress here:https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd/pull/35
-
SPO600 project part 2
STD-SIMD it's almost the same project I was working, but a bit advance https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd.
-
The Efficiency of Multithreaded Loops
If you are worried about Intel vs Arm vs whatever, use https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd
-
Thriving in a Crowded and Changing World: C++ 2006–2020 [pdf]
or https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Hpp which help quite a bit. Or https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd.
If you want GUIs, same, you have at least (but not only) Qt or WxWidgets.
Want to interface scripting? Pybind11, Boost.Python, WrenBind17 for Wren, Sol2 for Lua... and all things that interface to C work also if you feel brave...
I really think that when it is about getting the job done... C++ goes a long way towards the task.
This is my 20 year experience of C++, almost 13 of those years professionally. Now, back to read the paper. :)
-
All C++20 core language features with examples
... I just checked your link and wouldn't say that any of these languages have SIMD more than C++ has it currently -
- Java: incubation stage (how is that different from https://github.com/VcDevel/std-simd). Also Java is only getting it soonish for... amd64 and aarch64 ??
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 13 May 2024
Stats
VcDevel/std-simd is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of std-simd is C++.
Sponsored