wireguard-vyatta-ubnt VS pfSense

Joining serverless environments like AWS Lambda to a mesh network has traditionally been difficult because you can't directly access the network interfaces on the hosts that run your functions. The NetBird netstack mode addresses this by providing a simulated TUN device and a SOCKS5 proxy that targets that device. This allows your Lambda function to access other services in your NetBird network via the proxy.

NetBird simplifies Kubernetes access with its zero-configuration approach, leveraging WireGuard's simplicity and strength. It seamlessly integrates with various tools, offering transparency and high reliability as an open source solution.

WireGaurd

As for remote access, you will need another computer to install tailscale or wireguard vpn to access your local devices https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkKz7Vza1rw and the official docs for up to date advice https://www.wireguard.com/ this doesn't require much to run, you can use any old family computer or some old quad core 2nd-4th gen intel desktop for 30 bucks off facebook marketplace. You can also use that same computer to run klipper if you install proxmox and have two separate linux virtual machines.

Um modo mais avançado de se proteger é utilizando protocolos de VPN mais modernos, como o WireGuard. Muitos provedores de VPN oferecem suporte a este protocolo, que além de muito simples de usar e além do mais é open source.

here u find out how wireguard works https://www.wireguard.com/

WireGuard is a VPN protocol developed several years ago which is exremely fast, lightweight, and uses state-of-the art cryptography. Its performance blows legacy VPN's out of the water.

Try vanilla. It solved all my problems bar none.

One option is Firewalla Gold Plus, or you could buy a mini PC like it and run pfSense/OPNsense yourself.

Download and install pfsense as a virtual machine or partition: https://www.pfsense.org Configure it with the rules you want: https://youtu.be/VAGFGppSt74 Play with it, but be careful because it will block all traffic unless you check everything properly.

Another option is Firewalla, or buy a mini PC like it and run pfSense/OPNsense yourself. Two similar concepts, with the cost being either money or your DIY time. A lot of Firewalla users say that it's much easier for home use than pfSense/OPNsense, so you might find it worthwhile to spend a little more on it upfront and have to tinker less.

If you want firewall, I think you can use https://www.pfsense.org/ or https://opnsense.org/ , maybe running on an old PC or a Raspberry Pi. Not sure.

I've recently started using OPNsense. It's similar to pfSense, but seems to be considered a little more user-friendly.

For most router issues, I recommend people always put them in to dumb bridge mode and put a proper firewall like pfsense or opnsense as your gateway.

I have found that my historical average packet loss is about 0.02%. Something distinctly changed around 4/20 of this year, and now the average packet loss has gone up to 0.05% with spikes even higher, associated with periods of elevated ping times. It rarely did that before. Typically the IPv6 stack has more problems than v4 (especially an incident of packet loss on 4/28), and neither has been trouble-free since I started service in early 2020. My data comes from a pfSense installation.

I have done this using the Pfsense