Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Dom Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to dom
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
Playwright
Playwright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
sqlx
🧰 The Rust SQL Toolkit. An async, pure Rust SQL crate featuring compile-time checked queries without a DSL. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. (by launchbadge)
-
auto-animate
A zero-config, drop-in animation utility that adds smooth transitions to your web app. You can use it with React, Vue, or any other JavaScript application.
-
promises-spec
An open standard for sound, interoperable JavaScript promises—by implementers, for implementers.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
dom reviews and mentions
-
A Response to "Have Single-Page Apps Ruined the Web?"
in plain htmx, you can target an area that doesn't disrupt a playing video (e.g. the comments box appending to the comments) or you can use a morphing algorithm that disrupts the DOM less.
i have my own morphing algorithm (and a corresponding htmx plugin that allows you to use it) called idiomorph:
https://github.com/bigskysoftware/idiomorph/
i've also been working with the chrome team to get a feature added they are calling "atomic moves":
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1255
this would allow us to move elements around in the DOM without losing things like play state or focus or whatever
very excited for this last idea, I think it will be a huge boon for the web in general, not just for htmx
-
HTML Attributes vs. DOM Properties
What I said in my previous comment is observably true. Try making a demo where it isn't.
> A DOM node is a living mutable thing, but the JavaScript object representing that node is not.
The JavaScript object is mutable. The first example in the article shows this.
> That is also why a node list is not an array.
Modern APIs on the web return platform arrays (eg JavaScript arrays). https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#js-sequence - here's where the WebIDL spec specifies how to convert a sequence to a JavaScript array.
I'm fully aware of NodeList. There's a reason the spec calls them "old-style" https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#old-style-collections
> I can understand how this is confusing if you have never operated without a framework, but otherwise it’s really straightforward
Sighhhhhh. I've been a web developer for over 20 years, and spent a decade on the Chrome team working on web platform features. Most of my career has been on the low-level parts of the platform.
Could it be possible that people are disagreeing with you, not because they're stupid, but because you're in the wrong? Please try to be open minded. Try creating some demos that test your opinions.
-
Using XPath in 2023
Domenic Denicola (the man who ruined promises) probably will as well.
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/67
-
Which browser do you recommend, one for personal security-focused use and one for work?
I'm pretty sure it is, since I get "TypeError: nodes[i].parentNode.href is undefined" and "TypeError: $mainmenu.parent(...).get(...) is undefined" errors on both Pale Moon and LibreWolf. Which is part of Shadow/DOM, and originated from google (https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/06/the-state-of-web-components/). Not sure when this particular thing was introduced, since it's a "living standard"/experimental feature (https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/).
-
That people produce HTML with string templates is telling us something
JSX chose to align names to the DOM spec [0]. Same for htmlFor and friends.
[0] https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#ref-for-dom-element-classname%E...
-
Notback BETA - A new PHP frontend framework
You can see why I say this here: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org
-
Understanding the Benefits of "Quirky" Web Languages
The product logos in this article's cover image include different languages and technologies some of which are still relevant for web development today: HTML, CSS, JavaScript / ES / TypeScript (and the DOM), SVG, PDF, PHP, SQL (mySQL, MariaDB), mongoDB, Node.js (the most successful server-side implementation of JavaScript so far).
-
Declarative Shadow DOM
Thanks for the shout-out! I think I mention this in the talk, but note that YMMV. I designed that benchmark as a kind of "worst-case scenario" where shadow DOM / scoped styles really show a benefit. Depending on your CSS rules, DOM size, and amount of thrashing, the perf benefit could be small to large.
Also, it's still possible to shoot yourself in the foot, especially if you have a large/complex stylesheet repeated across multiple shadow roots. (Not because of the repetition – that's optimized in browsers [1] – but rather because of the number of DOM nodes affected.)
That said, I still think the perf benefits of shadow DOM have been undersung. And Declarative Shadow DOM makes it way more useful.
[1]: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/831#issuecomment-585489...
-
HTML DOM ️loves Javascript! 💕 #TLA 😘
We luh-luh-luv you! They gestated and nurtured the spec. They fought over bike sheds! All for us!!
- AI Found a Bug in My Code
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 20 May 2024
Stats
whatwg/dom is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of dom is HTML.
Sponsored