Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Top 13 C++ Fuse Projects
-
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
ffmpegfs
FUSE-based transcoding filesystem with video support from many formats to FLAC, MP4, TS, WebM, OGG, MP3, HLS, and others.
-
WinFsp-MemFs-Extended
tmpfs for Windows / Fully dynamic RAM disk by extending WinFsp's memfs to be variable size and maximally resource efficient without compromising performance
curl --silent --remote-name --location https://github.com/ceph/ceph/raw/octopus/src/cephadm/cephadmchmod a+x cephadm./cephadm bootstrap --mon-ip 192.168.1.41
The author needs to ask themselves: in this cloud technology stack, is there POSIX involved somewhere lower down, where I can't access it? The answer is, of course, "yes". The sort of cloud storage systems described all run on top of POSIX APIs. They provide convenience (cost efficiency is more debatable) compared to the POSIX alternative, but that's because they exist at an entirely different conceptual layer (hence the presence of POSIX anyway, just buried).
Your point about surfacing a POSIX that's actually there but hidden and thus visible to low-level Amazon employees building the S3 service which makes it invisible to S3 end customers is true but isn't the the point of the article. The author is saying there are motivations for a POSIX-like api visible also the end user.
So your explanation of stack looks like 2 layers: POSIX api <-- AWS S3 built on top of that
Author's essay is actually talking about 3 layers: POSIX <-- AWS S3 <-- POSIX
That's why the blog post has the following links to POSIX-on-top-of-S3-objects :
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse
https://github.com/kahing/goofys
https://www.cuno.io/
Project mention: DwarFS – The Deduplicating Warp-Speed Advanced Read-Only File System | news.ycombinator.com | 2024-04-11https://github.com/mhx/dwarfs/blob/main/doc/mkdwarfs.md#nils...
I know that cryfs[1] is resilient to at least the first of these, and possibly the second as well. I don't know if cryfs allows to modify the base directory while the filesystem is online, if it does then it might already be a better solution for syncthing, if you only care about Linux.
On the flip side syncthing could incorporate cryfs's base directory format instead of their home-grown one.
[1] https://www.cryfs.org/
This is actually a thing: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/pifs
NOTE:
The open source projects on this list are ordered by number of github stars.
The number of mentions indicates repo mentiontions in the last 12 Months or
since we started tracking (Dec 2020).
C++ Fuse related posts
-
Mergerfs – A Featureful Union Filesystem
-
How do I use multiple hard drives on Kubuntu for steam?
-
mergerfs v2.38.0 released
-
Is Posix Outdated?
-
Mergerfs and Snapraid installation
-
R2 slow PUT file transfer
-
EXT4 corrupted on a Seagate Drive several times. Any help appreciated
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 21 May 2024
Index
What are some of the best open-source Fuse projects in C++? This list will help you:
| Project | Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ceph | 13,311 |
| 2 | s3fs-fuse | 8,122 |
| 3 | mergerfs | 3,904 |
| 4 | btfs | 3,832 |
| 5 | dwarfs | 1,990 |
| 6 | cryfs | 1,947 |
| 7 | android-file-transfer-linux | 1,401 |
| 8 | securefs | 708 |
| 9 | sparsebundlefs | 310 |
| 10 | ffmpegfs | 195 |
| 11 | pifs | 140 |
| 12 | loggedfs | 110 |
| 13 | WinFsp-MemFs-Extended | 44 |
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com