Enzyme
chai
Enzyme | chai | |
---|---|---|
33 | 9 | |
19,962 | 8,076 | |
-0.0% | 0.1% | |
6.7 | 7.6 | |
4 months ago | 19 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Enzyme
-
The best testing strategies for frontends
Probably Enzyme was the first to popularize component testing in React by doing shallow rendering and expecting some things to be there in the React component tree. Then React Testing library came and took component testing to a whole new level.
-
Testing React Components: A Comprehensive Overview of Testing Libraries
Enzyme is another popular testing utility for React. It allows you to manipulate and traverse React components' output, making it easier to write comprehensive tests.
-
Speeding up the JavaScript ecosystem – Polyfills gone rogue
ljharb is an extremely interesting person. There’s no doubting the positive impact he’s had on the OSS community and the work he’s done.
However, there are some things he does that are incomprehensible.
For example, Enzyme. Over three years ago this issue was opened for Enzyme on React 17: https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme/issues/2429
Nothing moved for a while, and I think he said something along the lines of “if you want React 17 support, stop complaining and help”. So the community got involved. There are multiple PRs adding React 17 support. Many unofficial React 17 adapters. A lot of people have put a lot of work into this, ensuring compatibility, coverage etc. Yet to this day, none of them have been merged. Eg https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme/pull/2564
Given the amount of time that has passed, and the work the community has put in, something is amiss. It feels like he’s now intentionally avoiding React 17+ support. But why? I don’t understand why someone would ask for help then ignore the help when it comes in. That isn’t much better than the swathe of rude/entitled comments he was getting on the issue before he locked it.
I ended up migrating to RTL, but this made many of my tests more complicated (especially compared to shallow rendering).
-
Mastering React Testing: A Comprehensive Guide to Jest, Enzyme, and React Testing Library
Enzyme Documentation
-
How To Scale Your React Applications
One way to do this is by writing tests for your React components. Tools like Jest and Enzyme make it easy to test your component's behavior, rendering output, and state changes. By writing tests for your components, you can ensure that they behave as expected and prevent issues before they reach production.
-
Top OpenAI Tools, Examples & Use Cases
GitHub link: https://github.com/enzymejs/enzyme
-
How to Confidently Write Unit Tests using React Testing Library
So If you have experience with enzyme testing, where you might be checking the value of state once you click any button or you might be checking the prop value If something changes.
-
Difference Between JEST and Enzyme?
Enzyme offers two types of API for shallow rendering and full rendering. Both are preferred for different test scenarios and functionalities.
-
Testing with Jest and React Testing Library
At Visa, I was writing unit tests for a Next.js project using components designed with Chakra UI. That's where React Testing Library came in handy. Unlike other solutions like Enzyme, I did not have to worry about the application snapshot but could instead focus on each UI element, its expected behaviour and the data it would render upon user interactions.
-
Superset: Testing and Enzyme to RTL conversion
Superset uses Jest and React Testing Library (RTL) to write unit and integration tests. In the past we used Enzyme, but now that we're currently converting all of our class components to functional components, Enzyme cannot support our testing needs. Since RTL is better for testing functional components, we're converting all of our test files to RTL. This can be quite a learning curve - I've gone through a lot of the process so I'd like to share what I've learned so far.
chai
- Почему я программирую на Ruby
-
Typescript boilerplate test configuration with mocha, chai and sinon
Let's configure tests with mocha, chai and sinon on Typescript in a few steps.
-
Hands-On Hardhat Part-1
These options totally depend on your requirements. For example an empty hardhat option is a very basic project sample if you need more libraries, plugins or you use Typescript later, you have to add them manually. Like @nomiclabs/hardhat-waffle , [ethereum-waffle](https://www.npmjs.com/package/ethereum-waffle), chai , @nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers , ethers , [@openzeppelin/contracts](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openzeppelin/contracts) Because, they'll allow us to interact with Ethereum and to test our contracts.
-
Chaijs.com just let their domain expire
For those of you wondering what a "Chaijs" is like I was: https://github.com/chaijs/chai
> BDD / TDD assertion framework for node.js and the browser that can be paired with any testing framework.
-
Secure localStorage data with high level of encryption and data compression
ES6 test setup with Mocha and Chai.
-
Time to say goodbye - Enzyme.js
It'd be hard for me to imagine what would it be like back then to write tests if it wasn't for Enzyme. Even with Enzyme, it was noticeably harder than it is today, and I still vividly remember installing and configuring in my project Mocha, Chai, Sinon, and JSDOM, to get pretty much the same tooling that today a single library - Jest - provides out of the box, while adding numerous features on top of that.
-
API Testing Tools in JavaScript
The library offers a BDD testing style and fully exploits javascript promises - the resulting tests are simple, clear and expressive. Chakram is built on node.js, mocha, chai and request.
-
Unit testing async functions
For this example, I am using Mocha, plus Chai for its BDD expect syntax and the chai-as-promised plugin for asynchronous matchers.
-
A easy way to start developing smart contract
chai
What are some alternatives?
react-testing-library - 🐐 Simple and complete React DOM testing utilities that encourage good testing practices.
expect.js - Minimalistic BDD-style assertions for Node.JS and the browser.
Sinon.JS - Test spies, stubs and mocks for JavaScript.
WebdriverIO - Next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js
pactum - REST API Testing Tool for all levels in a Test Pyramid
jest - Delightful JavaScript Testing.
react-hook-form - 📋 React Hooks for form state management and validation (Web + React Native)
supertest - 🕷 Super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. Maintained for @forwardemail, @ladjs, @spamscanner, @breejs, @cabinjs, and @lassjs.
Jooks (Jest ❤ + Hooks 🤘🏻) - Testing hooks with Jest